Skip to main content

Peer-review policy

Peer-review is the system used to assess the quality of a manuscript before it is published. Independent researchers in the relevant research area assess submitted manuscripts for originality, validity and significance to help editors determine whether the manuscript should be published in their journal. You can read more about the peer-review process here.

Journal of International Humanitarian Action operates a double-blind peer-review system, where the reviewers do not know the names or affiliations of the authors and the reviewer reports provided to the authors are anonymous.
Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by two to three experts who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically sound and coherent, whether it duplicates already published work, and whether or not the manuscript is sufficiently clear for publication. Reviewers will also be asked to indicate how interesting and significant the research is. The Editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board.

Affiliated with

Annual Journal Metrics

  • Speed 2021
    172 days to first decision for all manuscripts (median)
    324 days to final disposition "accept" (mean average)

    Usage 2021
    198,474 downloads

    Speed Jan-Nov2022*
    156 days to first decision for all manuscripts (median)
    399 days to final disposition "accept" (mean average)

    Usage Jan-Nov2022*
    233,370 downloads

    *December 22 data will be added as soon as they become available