Self-efficacy and humanitarian aid workers

Journal of International Humanitarian Action

Table 2 Correlations between key study variables and demographic variables at time 1

	M (SD)	GSE	HIRI	SVS	PCL-5	Sheehan	Age	Gender	Educ.	Years as worker	Trauma history	Types of trauma
CICSE	51.2 (7.80)	.28*	.48**	−.26*	−.30*	−.39**	.02	.01	−.15	.17	−.29*	−.03
GSE	31.6 (4.44)		.29*	−.22	−.08	−.07	.12	.01	.24	.18	.02	.15
HIRI	41.1 (3.60)			−.46**	−.29*	−.44**	.02	.14	−.05	.20	−.10	.03
SVS	17.5 (9.41)				.41**	.43**	.03	−.23	−.22	−.10	.16	.04
PCL-5	9.3 (10.96)					.59**	.02	−.24	.07	.11	.26*	.16
Sheehan	2.9 (2.38)						−.01	−.22	−.01	−.02	.18	.04
Age	42.4 (10.51)							.01	.10	.55**	.19	.16
Gender	------								.18	−.05	−.23	−.05
Education	17.1 (2.07)									.15	.08	.10
Years as worker	11.1 (8.29)										.20	.32*
History of trauma	48 (yes) 15 (no)											.53**
# types of trauma	2.9 (3.08)

Note. N = 61–63. HIRI Headington Institute Resilience Inventory, SVS Stress Vulnerability Scale, PCL-5 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist Version 5, Sheehan Sheehan Global Assessment, CICSE critical incident coping self-efficacy, GSE general self-efficacy. History of trauma is a dichotomous variable. **p < .01. *p < .05