Table 2 Networks analysis as a tool for humanitarian protection: an analytical framework

 Tracing the network

Define the personal relations and social spaces of individuals in humanitarian protection.

Name generator

Network size

Cliques and subgroups

Visualization

• Networks enable better coping mechanisms.

• They might be the only tangible resource for some time.

• Valuable for self-protection.

 Core networks

Identifying the patterns and influence of the relational structure.

Densely knit homophilic networks.

Components and cliques

Degree centrality

Network composition

• Ensure that the core networks are well developed.

• Conduits to key informal support networks.

• Lead to the development of resilience.

 Weak ties

Identify ties which are weaker, but which could be instrumental in the network.

Typologies of personal networks

Centrality betweenness

Data mining

Visualisations

• Enable people to increase social bonding.

• The network is diversified through the inclusion of heterogeneous ties.

• Identify the risk in one’s composition and structure of network.

 Dynamic networks

Networks which change as a result of a crisis.

Study of atypical structures

Visualization and feedback

Longitudinal studies

Retrospective interviews

• Better understanding of the dynamic changes.

• Design effective strategies on how to locate support during the changes.

 Cohesion

The level of connectedness within a community.

Density

• Effective collaboration, cooperation and operation efficiency.

• Facilitates decision making processes.

 Network maps

Maps of a city on which networks are drawn.

Visualization

Geographical localization

• Can be used as guides for safety movement.

 Components

Specific parts of a network.

Components and cliques

• Accurate representation of structural relations.

 Coalitions

Different entities coming together for collaboration.

Network typologies

• Community resilience.

• Facilitate flow of information.

• Better resolution to complex problems.