Table 1 Questions asked in the post-user evaluation survey (survey 2)
From: The potential for computational IT tools in disaster relief and shelter design
Chart | Question | Response options |
|---|---|---|
A | How easy was the tool to use? | (Rate your answer 1 to 5; 1=very easy, 5=very difficult) |
B | Was the number of inputs about right? | (1 to 5; 1=I would have been happy to input more data; 5 = the tool asked for too much data) |
C | How clear and understandable was the input section of the tool? | (1 to 5; 1=very clear, 5=not clear at all) |
D | How clear and understandable was the output section of the tool? | (1 to 5; 1=very clear, 5=not clear at all) |
E | Can you imagine using such a design tool on any topic to evaluate existing shelter designs? | (1=such simple tools might be very useful, 5=such simple tools are unlike to ever be useful) |
F | Can you imagine using such a tool on any topic to evaluate potential new shelter designs (remember, this is a general question about computer-based tools, not a question about a tool for daylight calculations or environmental impact assessment? | (1=such simple tools might be very useful, 5=such simple tools are unlike to ever be useful) |
G | Might you ever recommend such a shelter design tool (on any topic) to your colleagues who work in the field? | (1=yes, frequently; 5=never on any topic) |
H | In what form would have you preferred the shelter design tool to be? | a. Excel-based b. Web application c. Standalone interface (internet not needed) |