From: Ethical considerations for closing humanitarian projects: a scoping review
Ethical consideration | Implications |
---|---|
Responsible planning | Promotes greater coherence, continuity, and predictability; can contribute to minimizing harms and create opportunities to apply lessons learned in other settings. |
Collaboration | Demonstrates respect for partners and other stakeholders; upholds the dignity and agency of local communities; can lead to the identification of potential harms. |
Adaptability | Enables responsiveness to the particularities of the situation, including where groups are experiencing increased vulnerability. |
Transparency | Promotes the agency of stakeholders and demonstrates respect; is a precondition for accountability by clarifying processes to be followed. |
Minimize harms | Encompasses vigilance for how closure processes will impact communities, project staff and partner organizations, and striving to minimize or avoid harms where possible. |
Sustainability | Promotes the possibility of long-term benefits for local communities, including ongoing access to quality services. |
Fairness | Attends to concerns of justice in how resources are allocated, as well as how burdens, harms, and benefits are distributed during and after project closure. |