Table 1 Document characteristics
From: Ethical considerations for closing humanitarian projects: a scoping review
| Document characteristics | |
|---|---|
| Source, n (%) | |
| Academic article | 27 (45%) |
| Agency/interagency reports | 24 (40%) |
| Books or book chapters | 9 (15%) |
| Total | 60* |
| Year, m | |
| Mode | 2012 |
| Range | 1965–2018 |
| Total | 60* |
| Organizations, n (%) | |
| None specified | 18 (29%) |
| Médecins Sans Frontières | 10 (16%) |
| The International Committee of the Red Cross | 9 (15%) |
| The International Federation of the Red Cross | 4 (6%) |
| United Nations related | 4 (6%) |
| The Inter-Agency Standing Committee | 3 (5%) |
| Médecins du Monde | 2 (3%) |
| World Health Organization, OXFAM, CARE, INSEAD Humanitarian Research Group, C-SAFE, Acting with Churches, The Global Management Project, The Global Camp Coordination and Camp Management Cluster, All in Diary, Solidarités International, Trócaire, Australian Government Disaster Management Team | 12 × 1 (19%) |
| Total | 62* |
| Location, n (%) | |
| Not specified | 42 (65%) |
| Syria | 3 (5%) |
| Palestine | 2 (3%) |
| Iraq | 2 (3%) |
| South Africa | 2 (3%) |
| South East Asia, East Timor, Uganda, Israel, France, Brazil, North Ireland, East Africa, Indonesia, Haiti, Myanmar, Libya, Jordan, Liberia | 14 × 1 (22%) |
| Total | 65* |
| Crisis type, n (%) | |
| Not specified | 18 (28%) |
| All humanitarian crises | 15 (23%) |
| Armed conflict | 9 (14%) |
| Natural disasters | 7 (11%) |
| Refugee/IDPs | 6 (9%) |
| Urban violence | 4 (6%) |
| War | 2 (3%) |
| Violence below threshold of armed conflict, food insecurity, undocumented migrants and asylum seekers, political instability | 4 × 1 (6%) |
| Total | 65* |
