From: Ethical considerations for closing humanitarian projects: a scoping review
Document characteristics | |
---|---|
Source, n (%) | |
Academic article | 27 (45%) |
Agency/interagency reports | 24 (40%) |
Books or book chapters | 9 (15%) |
Total | 60* |
Year, m | |
Mode | 2012 |
Range | 1965–2018 |
Total | 60* |
Organizations, n (%) | |
None specified | 18 (29%) |
Médecins Sans Frontières | 10 (16%) |
The International Committee of the Red Cross | 9 (15%) |
The International Federation of the Red Cross | 4 (6%) |
United Nations related | 4 (6%) |
The Inter-Agency Standing Committee | 3 (5%) |
Médecins du Monde | 2 (3%) |
World Health Organization, OXFAM, CARE, INSEAD Humanitarian Research Group, C-SAFE, Acting with Churches, The Global Management Project, The Global Camp Coordination and Camp Management Cluster, All in Diary, Solidarités International, Trócaire, Australian Government Disaster Management Team | 12 × 1 (19%) |
Total | 62* |
Location, n (%) | |
Not specified | 42 (65%) |
Syria | 3 (5%) |
Palestine | 2 (3%) |
Iraq | 2 (3%) |
South Africa | 2 (3%) |
South East Asia, East Timor, Uganda, Israel, France, Brazil, North Ireland, East Africa, Indonesia, Haiti, Myanmar, Libya, Jordan, Liberia | 14 × 1 (22%) |
Total | 65* |
Crisis type, n (%) | |
Not specified | 18 (28%) |
All humanitarian crises | 15 (23%) |
Armed conflict | 9 (14%) |
Natural disasters | 7 (11%) |
Refugee/IDPs | 6 (9%) |
Urban violence | 4 (6%) |
War | 2 (3%) |
Violence below threshold of armed conflict, food insecurity, undocumented migrants and asylum seekers, political instability | 4 × 1 (6%) |
Total | 65* |