From: The impact of emergency aid work on personal relationships: a psychodynamic study
Namea | Biographical details | Psychosocial formulation |
---|---|---|
Julian | Senior manager with 20 years of field experience, married with a stable home base. | Presented as confident and securely attached but acknowledged internal conflicts and high personal cost of the work. |
Thomas | Senior manager with 25 years of field experience, in a long-term “open” relationship | Presented as calm and measured. Although he described himself as approachable, he evidenced traits of an avoidant attachment styleb |
Jane | Had taken a mid-career break from the field in order to reflect on her life and build a more stable home base. Described a close circle of female friends but no partner. | Presented as active and engaged but somewhat anxious. Had used counselling to try and work through a perceived struggle to integrate different areas of her life. |
Anna | Was currently on deployment, away from a secure home base and long-term partner. | Presented as calm and level-headed but concerned by a sense that field work is incompatible with longer-term family life. Evidenced avoidant attachment traits. |
Emma | Experienced senior manager, currently between deployments. Married with children having established a home base in an adopted country. | Presented as confident and assertive but indicated high levels of frustration with the difficulties of adapting to life outside the field. Indicated anger at having been assigned a coping role in family of origin. |
Sara | Experience practitioner based at HQ with frequent travel to the field. Described global friendship circle but no partner. | Presented as a motivated and principled individual, with strong beliefs in personal autonomy. Also evidenced avoidant attachment traits and had sought counselling to explore continuing lack of intimate partner relationship. |