From: Research agenda-setting on cash programming for health and nutrition in humanitarian settings
Stage | Purpose | Approach | Time-line |
---|---|---|---|
1. Establishment of advisory group and development of methodological approach | To guide the methodological approach | Members from the advisory group discussed methodology and criteria for prioritisation via Skype and email. | Three 60–90 min Skype discussions (October 2016–February 2017); 30-min face-to-face meeting during consultation on cash (4 November 2016); email feedback (October 2016–June 2017). |
2. Consultation on research questions (a) Online survey (b) Face-to-face group session | To identify key research questions on this topic | (a) Sample of global stakeholders was invited to complete the survey. (b) Attendees of a consultation session on cash were asked to list research questions. | (a) 10-min survey was open for 3Â weeks (28 March to 19 April 2017) (b) 1Â h face-to-face session on 4 November 2016 |
3. Clarification and prioritisation of research questions and categories | To refine and rank research questions and categories | Members of the advisory group were asked to prioritise research questions based on four criteria. Content analysis was used to develop and rank research categories. | About 1.5Â h during 1Â month (11 May to 11 June 2017) |
4. Triangulation of findings with past evidence reviews | To check whether identified categories (a) have not yet been addressed by primary research and (b) whether existing literature reviews recommend research on similar or differing topics. | Published and unpublished literature reviews were identified (through recommendations by authors, searching the CALP library, and checking reference lists of selected papers) and discussed in relation to identified research categories. | October–November 2017 |